EPYC 7251 vs EPYC 7301

EPYC 7251 vs EPYC 7301 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7251

8 / 16

14,935

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

EPYC 7301

16 / 32

14,991

+0.4%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7251 vs EPYC 7301 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7251 vs EPYC 7301: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7251

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 170W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7301 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,935 vs 14,991).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌41.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7301 better than EPYC 7251?

Yes. EPYC 7301 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7301 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7301 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7301 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7301 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7301 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7251 vs EPYC 7301 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7251

The EPYC 7251 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,935 points. Launch price was $574.

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7251 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7301 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7251 versus 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7251 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7251 scores 14,935 against the EPYC 7301's 14,991 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7301. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7251 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301.

Feature	EPYC 7251	EPYC 7301
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+7%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,935	14,991