EPYC 7251 vs Xeon D-1733NT

EPYC 7251 vs Xeon D-1733NT Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7251

8 / 16

14,935

+0.6%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1733NT

8 / 16

14,849

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7251 vs Xeon D-1733NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7251 vs Xeon D-1733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7251

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

❌126.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 53W.

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 53W instead of 120W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7251 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,849 vs 14,935).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while EPYC 7251 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7251 better than Xeon D-1733NT?

Yes. EPYC 7251 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7251 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7251 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7251 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. EPYC 7251 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon D-1733NT only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 8.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7251 vs Xeon D-1733NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7251

The EPYC 7251 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,935 points. Launch price was $574.

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7251 and Xeon D-1733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7251 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1733NT (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7251 is built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7251 scores 14,935 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7251. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7251 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

Feature	EPYC 7251	Xeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+5%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+113%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	—
PassMark	14,935	14,849

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7251 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.