EPYC 7551
VS
Core Ultra 7 165H

EPYC 7551 vs Core Ultra 7 165H

AMD

EPYC 7551

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7551

#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
13%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
152%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
135%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
104%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
104%
#19
EPYC 7551
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
95%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
94%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 165H

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
105%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
103%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
102%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
101%
#128
Core Ultra 7 165H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 165H (2023) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7551Core Ultra 7 165H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7551 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7551Core Ultra 7 165H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7551 and Core Ultra 7 165H

AMD

EPYC 7551

The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7551 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 50% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 165H (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7551 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551 scores 25,844 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 7 165H. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.

FeatureEPYC 7551Core Ultra 7 165H
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+100%
16 / 22
Boost Clock
3 GHz
5 GHz+67%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+167%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
25,844
25,849
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7551 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7551Core Ultra 7 165H
Socket
TR4
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%