EPYC 7551 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

AMD

EPYC 7551

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7551 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7551 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7551 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7551

2017

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (25,844 vs 26,054).
  • 176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while EPYC 7551 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than EPYC 7551?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7551 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (86.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7551 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7551

The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7551 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7551 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551 scores 25,844 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.

FeatureEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+300%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+100%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
25,844
26,054
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7551 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Socket
TR4
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0