Core Ultra 7 165H
VS
EPYC 7551

Core Ultra 7 165H vs EPYC 7551

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7551

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 165H

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
105%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
103%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
102%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
101%
#128
Core Ultra 7 165H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7551

#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
13%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
152%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
135%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
104%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
104%
#19
EPYC 7551
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
95%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
94%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 165H (2023) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 165HEPYC 7551
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7551 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 165HEPYC 7551
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 165H and EPYC 7551

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

AMD

EPYC 7551

The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 165H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the EPYC 7551 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 — a 50% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 165H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7551 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 25,849 against the EPYC 7551's 25,844 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 7 165H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 165HEPYC 7551
Cores / Threads
16 / 22
32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+67%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+90%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
25,849
25,844
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7551 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 165HEPYC 7551
Socket
FCBGA2049
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0