Core i7-13700H vs Core Ultra 7 165H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700H vs Core Ultra 7 165H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700H vs Core Ultra 7 165H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700H

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $502 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core Ultra 7 165H

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,140).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700H better than Core Ultra 7 165H?

Yes. Core i7-13700H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700H is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700H comes in at an unclear MSRP at $502 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 165H is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i7-13700H vs Core Ultra 7 165H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700H

The Core i7-13700H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,140 points. Launch price was $502.

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700H versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700H scores 26,140 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-13700H. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-13700H	Core Ultra 7 165H
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 22+14%
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark	26,140+1%	25,849
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,101	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,279	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,208	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700H	Core Ultra 7 165H
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700H) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). The Core i7-13700H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU.