Core Ultra 7 165H
VS
Ryzen 7 250

Core Ultra 7 165H vs Ryzen 7 250

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 250

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 165H

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
105%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
103%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
102%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
101%
#128
Core Ultra 7 165H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 7 250 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 7 165H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 250
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 165H and Ryzen 7 250

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

AMD

Ryzen 7 250

The Ryzen 7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,677 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 165H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 7 250 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 250 — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 250 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 25,849 against the Ryzen 7 250's 25,677 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 165H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 250.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 250
Cores / Threads
16 / 22+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+15%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
25,849
25,677
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 250 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 250
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0