EPYC 9124
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
EPYC 9124 vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9124 vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9124 vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9124
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.3 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $483 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.0 vs 40.3 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while EPYC 9124 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,174 vs 43,638).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9124, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than EPYC 9124?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9124 vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9124
The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9124 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 9124 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9124 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9124 scores 43,638 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9124. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9124 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 43,638+1% | 43,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,770 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9124 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9124 versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9124) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9124) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the EPYC 9124 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9124) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | EPYC 9124 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 8000+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9124) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the EPYC 9124 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | EPYC 9124 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9124 was priced at $1083, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 came in at $600. On launch pricing ($1083 vs $600), Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 was $483 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9124 delivers 40.3 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 the 56.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9124 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1083 | $600-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.3 | 72.0+79% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9124 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
