Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 9124

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 9124 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13790F

16 / 24

43,549

0.0%

43,638

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 9124 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 9124: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13790F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $691 less on MSRP ($392 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Delivers 175.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.1 vs 40.3 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,673 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9124, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9124

2022

Why buy it

✅+31.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13790F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.3 vs 111.1 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13790F better than EPYC 9124?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9124 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13790F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9124 is the stronger fit. You are getting 31.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13790F is the better buy right now. Core i7-13790F comes in $691 cheaper on MSRP at $392 MSRP versus $1,083 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9124 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 31.6% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 175.7% better value on MSRP (111.1 vs 40.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13790F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 9124 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13790F

The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.

EPYC 9124

The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 9124's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13790F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13790F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9124 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the EPYC 9124's 43,638 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 9124. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 1,770, a 45.6% lead for the Core i7-13790F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,673 vs 18,000 (27.3% advantage for the EPYC 9124). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9124.

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 9124
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+41%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+94%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	43,549	43,638
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,247	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,815+59%	1,770
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,673	18,000+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13790F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9124 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13790F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9124 — the Core i7-13790F supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13790F) vs 12 (EPYC 9124). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 128 (EPYC 9124) — the EPYC 9124 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and SP5 (EPYC 9124).

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 9124
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6144 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	128+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13790F) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9124). Primary use case: EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 9124
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13790F was priced at $392, while the EPYC 9124 came in at $1083. On launch pricing ($392 vs $1083), Core i7-13790F was $691 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13790F delivers 111.1 pts/$ vs 40.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9124 — making the Core i7-13790F the 93.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 9124
MSRP	$392-64%	$1083
Performance per Dollar	111.1+176%	40.3
Release Date	2023	2022

Search Core i7-13790F on Amazon

Search EPYC 9124 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.