
Core i7-13790F

Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core i7-13790F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13790F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13790F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13790F
2023Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β +37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- β Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 111.1 vs 147.7 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245KF can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $98 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
- β Delivers 33.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 147.7 vs 111.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores), while Core i7-13790F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (43,424 vs 43,549).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- β92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245KF better than Core i7-13790F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13790F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13790F
The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.

Core Ultra 5 245KF
The Core Ultra 5 245KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,424 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF offers 14 cores / 14 threads β the Core i7-13790F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245KF β identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-13790F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the Core Ultra 5 245KF's 43,424 β a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-13790F. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245KF.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+14% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total)+38% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | 10 nm | 3 nm-70% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 43,549 | 43,424 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,247 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,673 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13790F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13790F versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245KF β the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 20 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) β the Core Ultra 5 245KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245KF).
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 6400+14% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 245KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-13790F supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245KF includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)), while the Core i7-13790F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245KF rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13790F was priced at $392, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF came in at $294. On launch pricing ($392 vs $294), Core Ultra 5 245KF was $98 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13790F delivers 111.1 pts/$ vs 147.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245KF β making the Core Ultra 5 245KF the 28.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $392 | $294-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.1 | 147.7+33% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















