
Core i7-13790F

Core i9-14900HX
Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-14900HX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-14900HX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-14900HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13790F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $276 less on MSRP ($392 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.1 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,815 vs 3,000).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (26,247 vs 35,000).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+6.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-13790F needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13790F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 111.1 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Core i7-13790F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-14900HX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13790F
The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.

Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-14900HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-13790F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-14900HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the Core i9-14900HX's 44,685 — a 2.6% lead for the Core i9-14900HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,247 vs 35,000 (28.6% advantage for the Core i9-14900HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 3,000, a 6.4% lead for the Core i9-14900HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,673 vs 17,500 (24.6% advantage for the Core i9-14900HX). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 32+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.7 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) |
| PassMark | 43,549 | 44,685+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,247 | 35,000+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | 3,000+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,673 | 17,500+28% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13790F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-14900HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 20 (Core i9-14900HX) — the Core i9-14900HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX).
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-14900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-13790F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13790F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX). The Core i9-14900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-13790F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Flagship Gaming Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13790F was priced at $392, while the Core i9-14900HX came in at $668. On launch pricing ($392 vs $668), Core i7-13790F was $276 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13790F delivers 111.1 pts/$ vs 66.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900HX — making the Core i7-13790F the 49.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $392-41% | $668 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.1+66% | 66.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















