
Core i7-13790F

Ryzen 9 5900XT
Core i7-13790F vs Ryzen 9 5900XT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13790F vs Ryzen 9 5900XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13790F vs Ryzen 9 5900XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13790F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+21.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.1 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.4 vs 111.1 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,320 vs 2,815).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,000 vs 26,247).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13790F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13790F better than Ryzen 9 5900XT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13790F vs Ryzen 9 5900XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13790F
The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.


Ryzen 9 5900XT
The Ryzen 9 5900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 44,105 points. Launch price was $349.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 5900XT's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13790F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13790F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the Ryzen 9 5900XT's 44,105 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900XT. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,247 vs 22,000 (17.6% advantage for the Core i7-13790F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 2,320, a 19.3% lead for the Core i7-13790F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,673 vs 14,000 (2.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900XT). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900XT.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+8% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 64 MB+94% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 43,549 | 44,105+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,247+19% | 22,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815+21% | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,673 | 14,000+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13790F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13790F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — the Core i7-13790F supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13790F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900XT) — the Ryzen 9 5900XT offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 5900XT).
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-13790F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13790F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900XT targets High End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High End Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13790F was priced at $392, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT came in at $349. On launch pricing ($392 vs $349), Ryzen 9 5900XT was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13790F delivers 111.1 pts/$ vs 126.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900XT — making the Ryzen 9 5900XT the 12.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $392 | $349-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.1 | 126.4+14% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














