Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 7343

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 7343 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13790F

16 / 24

43,549

0.0%

43,644

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 7343 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 7343: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13790F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,173 less on MSRP ($392 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 298.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.1 vs 27.9 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 190W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (43,549 vs 43,644).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7343, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7343

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13790F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 111.1 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
❌192.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13790F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13790F better than EPYC 7343?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7343 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13790F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7343 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 287.9% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13790F is the better buy right now. Core i7-13790F comes in $1,173 cheaper on MSRP at $392 MSRP versus $1,565 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7343 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 298.4% better value on MSRP (111.1 vs 27.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13790F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13790F vs EPYC 7343 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13790F

The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.

EPYC 7343

The EPYC 7343 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,644 points. Launch price was $1,565.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 7343's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7343 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13790F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13790F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7343 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the EPYC 7343's 43,644 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7343. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7343.

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 7343
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+33%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+288%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm	7 nm+-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	43,549	43,644
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,247	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,815	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,673	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13790F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7343 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13790F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7343 — the Core i7-13790F supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7343 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13790F) vs 8 (EPYC 7343). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 128 (EPYC 7343) — the EPYC 7343 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and SP3 (EPYC 7343).

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 7343
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	128+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13790F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7343). Direct competitor: EPYC 7343 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 7343
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13790F was priced at $392, while the EPYC 7343 came in at $1565. On launch pricing ($392 vs $1565), Core i7-13790F was $1173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13790F delivers 111.1 pts/$ vs 27.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7343 — making the Core i7-13790F the 119.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13790F	EPYC 7343
MSRP	$392-75%	$1565
Performance per Dollar	111.1+298%	27.9
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Core i7-13790F on Amazon

Search EPYC 7343 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.