EPYC 9124 vs Xeon Gold 6312U

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9124

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6312U

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9124 vs Xeon Gold 6312U Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9124

16 / 32

43,638

+2.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6312U

24 / 48

42,443

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9124 vs Xeon Gold 6312U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9124 vs Xeon Gold 6312U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9124

2022

Why buy it

✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $562 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,645 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.3 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,645 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6312U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6312U

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 185W instead of 200W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (42,443 vs 43,638).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 40.3 PassMark/$ ($1,645 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9124 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9124 better than Xeon Gold 6312U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6312U is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9124 pulls ahead with 2.8% better PassMark. EPYC 9124 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9124 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9124 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9124 comes in $562 cheaper on MSRP at $1,083 MSRP versus $1,645 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6312U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 56.2% better value on MSRP (40.3 vs 25.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9124 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9124 vs Xeon Gold 6312U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9124

The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.

Xeon Gold 6312U

The Xeon Gold 6312U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,443 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9124 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6312U offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6312U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6312U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9124 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9124 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6312U uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9124 scores 43,638 against the Xeon Gold 6312U's 42,443 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 9124. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9124 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6312U.

Feature	EPYC 9124	Xeon Gold 6312U
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+3%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+78%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	43,638+3%	42,443
Geekbench 6 Single	1,770	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9124 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6312U uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9124 versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6312U — the EPYC 9124 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9124) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6312U). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9124) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6312U) — the EPYC 9124 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9124) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6312U).

Feature	EPYC 9124	Xeon Gold 6312U
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB	6144 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9124) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6312U). Primary use case: EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Xeon Gold 6312U rivals EPYC 7413.

Feature	EPYC 9124	Xeon Gold 6312U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9124 was priced at $1083, while the Xeon Gold 6312U came in at $1645. On launch pricing ($1083 vs $1645), EPYC 9124 was $562 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9124 delivers 40.3 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6312U — making the EPYC 9124 the 43.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9124	Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP	$1083-34%	$1645
Performance per Dollar	40.3+56%	25.8
Release Date	2022	2021

Search EPYC 9124 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6312U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.