EPYC 9354P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

AMD

EPYC 9354P

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019

EPYC 9354P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9354P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9354P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9354P

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $1,260 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 36.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
  • βœ…Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
  • βœ…45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (74,808 vs 79,889).

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
    • ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9354P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
    • ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3990X better than EPYC 9354P?
    Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9354P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper 3990X comes in 46.2% more expensive on MSRP at $3,990 MSRP versus $2,730 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9354P is also 36.9% better value on MSRP (27.4 vs 20.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9354P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    EPYC 9354P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9354P

    The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022βˆ’2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.

    AMD

    Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

    The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9354P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 cores / 128 threads β€” the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X β€” a 12.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9354P uses the Genoa (2022βˆ’2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019βˆ’2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9354P scores 74,808 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 β€” a 6.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354P vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.

    FeatureEPYC 9354PRyzen Threadripper 3990X
    Cores / Threads
    32 / 64
    64 / 128+100%
    Boost Clock
    3.8 GHz
    4.3 GHz+13%
    Base Clock
    3.25 GHz+12%
    2.9 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    512K (per core)+51100%
    Process
    5 nm, 6 nm-29%
    7 nm, 12 nm
    Architecture
    Genoa (2022βˆ’2023)
    Matisse (2019βˆ’2020)
    PassMark
    74,808
    79,889+7%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    β€”
    64,366
    Geekbench 6 Single
    β€”
    1,961
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    β€”
    22,045
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 9354P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9354P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X β€” the EPYC 9354P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354P supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB β€” 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9354P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9354P) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) β€” the EPYC 9354P offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354P) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).

    FeatureEPYC 9354PRyzen Threadripper 3990X
    Socket
    SP5
    TR4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    4800+50%
    DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    6144 GB+2300%
    256 GB
    RAM Channels
    12+200%
    4
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128+45%
    88
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β€” a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9354P supports AVX-512 instructions β€” important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.

    FeatureEPYC 9354PRyzen Threadripper 3990X
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    Yes
    AVX-512
    Yes
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
    true
    πŸ’°

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9354P was priced at $2730, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X came in at $3990. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $3990), EPYC 9354P was $1260 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354P delivers 27.4 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X β€” making the EPYC 9354P the 31.1% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9354PRyzen Threadripper 3990X
    MSRP
    $2730-32%
    $3990
    Performance per Dollar
    27.4+37%
    20.0
    Release Date
    2022
    2019

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.