EPYC 9354P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

AMD

EPYC 9354P

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

48 Cores96 Thrd350 WWMax: 4 GHz2023
Similar parts
··

EPYC 9354P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9354P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9354P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9354P

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $3,767 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
  • Delivers 123.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
  • Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (74,808 vs 79,683).

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

2023

Why buy it

  • +6.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9354P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
  • 25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9354P better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9354P is ahead with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ pulls ahead with 6.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.5% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9354P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9354P comes in $3,767 cheaper on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 6.5% better PassMark. It is also 123.4% better value on MSRP (27.4 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9354P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9354P

The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9354P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 9354P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9354P scores 74,808 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 6.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.

FeatureEPYC 9354PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.25 GHz+41%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-50%
10 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
74,808
79,683+7%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
55,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9354P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9354P versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354P supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9354P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9354P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the EPYC 9354P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).

FeatureEPYC 9354PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+50%
4096 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.

FeatureEPYC 9354PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High Performance Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9354P was priced at $2730, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $6497), EPYC 9354P was $3767 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354P delivers 27.4 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the EPYC 9354P the 76.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9354PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP
$2730-58%
$6497
Performance per Dollar
27.4+123%
12.3
Release Date
2022
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.