PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

✅+16.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $4,205 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9534

2022

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,650 vs 1,923).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 18,576).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).

EPYC 9454P

2022

EPYC 9534

2022

Why buy it

✅+16.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $4,205 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,650 vs 1,923).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 18,576).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454P better than EPYC 9534?

Yes. EPYC 9454P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 19.8% better Geekbench multi-core, and 6.3% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9454P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454P is the better fit. You are getting 19.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9454P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9454P is $4,205 cheaper on MSRP at $4,598 MSRP versus $8,803 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 103.5% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9534 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9454P Benchmark Check

EPYC 9534 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
1080p
low	171 FPS	170 FPS
medium	142 FPS	141 FPS
high	122 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	148 FPS
medium	120 FPS	119 FPS
high	97 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	70 FPS
medium	60 FPS	59 FPS
high	47 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open EPYC 9534

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
1080p
low	533 FPS	524 FPS
medium	465 FPS	457 FPS
high	373 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	431 FPS
medium	392 FPS	385 FPS
high	323 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	250 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	246 FPS	241 FPS
high	216 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open EPYC 9534

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
1080p
low	672 FPS	671 FPS
medium	561 FPS	560 FPS
high	522 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	454 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	511 FPS
medium	426 FPS	425 FPS
high	390 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	376 FPS
medium	294 FPS	293 FPS
high	263 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	210 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open EPYC 9534

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
1080p
low	902 FPS	902 FPS
medium	822 FPS	822 FPS
high	708 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	625 FPS	623 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	724 FPS
medium	631 FPS	631 FPS
high	540 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	462 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	519 FPS	519 FPS
medium	464 FPS	464 FPS
high	407 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	350 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open EPYC 9534

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454P and EPYC 9534

EPYC 9454P

The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

EPYC 9534

The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9534 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9534 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9454P (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the EPYC 9534's 89,077 — a 6.1% lead for the EPYC 9454P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,923 vs 1,650, a 15.3% lead for the EPYC 9454P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,576 vs 15,500 (18.1% advantage for the EPYC 9454P). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	64 / 128+33%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+12%	2.45 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	94,686+6%	89,077
Geekbench 6 Single	1,923+17%	1,650
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,576+20%	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454P) and SP5 (EPYC 9534).

Feature	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6144 GB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9534 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	EPYC 9534
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9454P launched at $4598 MSRP, while the EPYC 9534 debuted at $8803. On MSRP ($4598 vs $8803), the EPYC 9454P is $4205 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 10.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9534 — making the EPYC 9454P the 68.2% better value option.