EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9454P

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9454P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9375F

32 / 64

95,768

+1.1%

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

EPYC 9454P

48 / 96

94,686

0.0%

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9454P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9454P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $708 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 320W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,576 vs 26,020).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than EPYC 9454P?

Yes. EPYC 9375F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 40.1% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the stronger fit. You are getting 40.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9454P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9375F comes in 15.4% more expensive on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $4,598 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9454P is also 14.1% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9375F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 48/96. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9454P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

EPYC 9454P

The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9454P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9454P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9454P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the EPYC 9454P's 94,686 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,923, a 43.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 18,576 (33.4% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9454P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+26%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+40%	2.75 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	95,768+1%	94,686
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981+55%	1,923
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020+40%	18,576

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454P — the EPYC 9375F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and SP5 (EPYC 9454P).

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9454P
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9454P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	Data Center / Single Socket

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the EPYC 9454P came in at $4598. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $4598), EPYC 9454P was $708 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 20.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9454P — making the EPYC 9454P the 13.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9454P
MSRP	$5306	$4598-13%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	20.6+14%
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 9375F on Amazon

Search EPYC 9454P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.