EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9754

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9754 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9375F

32 / 64

95,768

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

EPYC 9754

128 / 256

98,450

+2.8%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9754 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9754: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,594 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 118.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 360W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,825 vs 26,020).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than EPYC 9754?

Yes. EPYC 9375F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 33.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 54.7% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 33.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the stronger fit. You are getting 54.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9375F comes in $6,594 cheaper on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 33.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 118.2% better value on MSRP (18.0 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9375F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 128/256. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9754 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 43% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9754 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 9754. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,634, a 58.4% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 16,825 (42.9% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9754
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	128 / 256+300%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+55%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+71%	2.25 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Bergamo (2023)
PassMark	95,768	98,450+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	104,584
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981+82%	1,634
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020+55%	16,825

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 — the EPYC 9375F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9754
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9754
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	Data Center / Cloud Native

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the EPYC 9754 came in at $11900. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $11900), EPYC 9375F was $6594 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9375F the 74.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	EPYC 9754
MSRP	$5306-55%	$11900
Performance per Dollar	18.0+117%	8.3
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9375F on Amazon

Search EPYC 9754 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.