EPYC 9375F
Xeon Platinum 8570
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9375F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,289 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 26,020).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9375F better than Xeon Platinum 8570?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,960, a 41.3% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 18,960 (31.4% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 56 / 112+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+83% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 95,768+2% | 93,722 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 65,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+52% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020+37% | 18,960 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the EPYC 9375F supports 7.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the EPYC 9375F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+7% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 came in at $9595. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $9595), EPYC 9375F was $4289 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the EPYC 9375F the 59.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-45% | $9595 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+84% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and Xeon Platinum 8570
