EPYC 9355P
EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9375F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9375F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9375F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9355P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $2,308 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
EPYC 9375F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (95,768 vs 97,249).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9355P better than EPYC 9375F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9375F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9355P
The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9355P and EPYC 9375F share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F — a 8.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.55 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the EPYC 9375F's 95,768 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 9355P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz | 3.85 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 97,249+2% | 95,768 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,981 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,020 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and SP5 (EPYC 9375F).
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center / Frequency Optimized |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9355P was priced at $2998, while the EPYC 9375F came in at $5306. On launch pricing ($2998 vs $5306), EPYC 9355P was $2308 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 18.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9375F — making the EPYC 9355P the 57% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2998-43% | $5306 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4+80% | 18.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9355P and EPYC 9375F
