EPYC 9355P vs Xeon w9-3595X

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9355P

32 / 64

97,249

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7945HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon w9-3595X

60 / 120

97,534

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Costs $2,891 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 385W, a 105W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (97,249 vs 97,534).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
❌37.5% higher power demand at 385W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than EPYC 9355P?

Yes. Xeon w9-3595X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3595X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3595X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 60 cores and 120 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3595X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9355P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w9-3595X comes in 96.4% more expensive on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $2,998 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9355P is also 95.9% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3595X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 60 cores / 120 threads instead of 32/64 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	60 / 120+88%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.55 GHz+77%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+128%	112.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	97,249	97,534
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	130,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9355P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the EPYC 9355P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9355P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9355P) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9355P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 9355P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon w9-3595X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9355P was priced at $2998, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($2998 vs $5889), EPYC 9355P was $2891 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the EPYC 9355P the 64.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP	$2998-49%	$5889
Performance per Dollar	32.4+95%	16.6
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 9355P on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.