EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9754

EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9754 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9355P

32 / 64

97,249

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7945HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

EPYC 9754

128 / 256

98,450

+1.2%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9754 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9754: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $8,902 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 292.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 360W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (97,249 vs 98,450).

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 360W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9355P better than EPYC 9754?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9355P is ahead with a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9355P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9355P comes in $8,902 cheaper on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9754 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 292.1% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9355P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9754 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 34.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9355P (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9754 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9754. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	EPYC 9754
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	128 / 256+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+42%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.55 GHz+58%	2.25 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Bergamo (2023)
PassMark	97,249	98,450+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	104,584
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,634
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,825

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 — the EPYC 9355P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).

Feature	EPYC 9355P	EPYC 9754
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	EPYC 9754
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center / Cloud Native

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9355P was priced at $2998, while the EPYC 9754 came in at $11900. On launch pricing ($2998 vs $11900), EPYC 9355P was $8902 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9355P the 118.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	EPYC 9754
MSRP	$2998-75%	$11900
Performance per Dollar	32.4+290%	8.3
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9355P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9754 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.