EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8570

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9355P

32 / 64

97,249

+3.8%

Ryzen 9 7945HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 / 112

93,722

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,597 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 232.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (93,722 vs 97,249).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9355P better than Xeon Platinum 8570?

Yes. EPYC 9355P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9355P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9355P is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9355P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9355P comes in $6,597 cheaper on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $9,595 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 232.1% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9355P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 56/112. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9355P (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 3.7% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8570
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	56 / 112+75%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.55 GHz+69%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	97,249+4%	93,722
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	65,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9355P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the EPYC 9355P supports 7.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9355P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9355P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9355P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the EPYC 9355P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8570
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+7%	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8570
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9355P was priced at $2998, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 came in at $9595. On launch pricing ($2998 vs $9595), EPYC 9355P was $6597 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the EPYC 9355P the 107.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP	$2998-69%	$9595
Performance per Dollar	32.4+231%	9.8
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9355P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.