EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9375F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+98.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $1,193 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,500 vs 2,981).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 26,020).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9375F better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,500, a 66.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 20,000 (26.2% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+43% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 95,768+1% | 94,737 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 66,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+99% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020+30% | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the EPYC 9375F supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+88% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX came in at $6499. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $6499), EPYC 9375F was $1193 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the EPYC 9375F the 21.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-18% | $6499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+23% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
