EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,444) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3124%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,444) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,500, a 66.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 20,000 (26.2% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+43% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 95,768+1% | 94,737 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 66,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+99% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020+30% | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. At current prices ($108 vs $3444), the EPYC 9375F is $3336 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 886.7 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the EPYC 9375F the 188% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-18% | $6499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $108-97% | $3444 |
| Performance per Dollar | 886.7+3124% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
