EPYC 9375F
Xeon 6747P
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6747P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6747P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6747P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9375F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,191 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (26,020 vs 45,000).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6747P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+72.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6747P better than EPYC 9375F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6747P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Xeon 6747P
The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 20.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 6% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 2,000, a 39.4% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 45,000 (53.4% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+43% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 95,768 | 101,685+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+49% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020 | 45,000+73% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6747P — the Xeon 6747P supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9375F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400+7% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the Xeon 6747P came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $6497), EPYC 9375F was $1191 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the EPYC 9375F the 14.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-18% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+15% | 15.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and Xeon 6747P
