
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9375F

Xeon 6747P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6747P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,497) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+5566%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,497) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Xeon 6747P
The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 20.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 6% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 2,000, a 39.4% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 45,000 (53.4% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+43% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 95,768 | 101,685+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+49% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020 | 45,000+73% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9375F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. At current prices ($108 vs $6497), the EPYC 9375F is $6389 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 886.7 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the EPYC 9375F the 193.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-18% | $6497 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $108-98% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 886.7+5548% | 15.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















