EPYC 9375F vs Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 9375F
Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+5355%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 2,300, a 25.8% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 17,118 (41.3% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 60 / 120+88% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+93% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+128% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 95,768 | 97,534+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 130,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+30% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020+52% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 9375F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. At current prices ($108 vs $6000), the EPYC 9375F is $5892 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 886.7 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the EPYC 9375F the 192.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-10% | $5889 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $108-98% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 886.7+5340% | 16.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and Xeon w9-3595X
