EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,699.99) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2456%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,699.99) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 3.85 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 3,349, a 11.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 30,722 (16.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz | 4.2 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 95,768+2% | 93,660 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 60,336 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981 | 3,349+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020 | 30,722+18% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX debuted at $2899. At current prices ($108 vs $2699.99), the EPYC 9375F is $2592 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 886.7 pts/$ vs 34.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — making the EPYC 9375F the 184.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306 | $2899-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $108-96% | $2699.99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 886.7+2455% | 34.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
