EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9474F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9474F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9474F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9375F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,474 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 360W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (95,768 vs 102,255).
EPYC 9474F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+6.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9375F better than EPYC 9474F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 9474F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9474F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9474F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F — a 15.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9474F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the EPYC 9474F's 102,255 — a 6.6% lead for the EPYC 9474F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+17% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+7% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 95,768 | 102,255+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9474F — the EPYC 9375F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and SP5 (EPYC 9474F).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | Data Center / Performance Optimized |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the EPYC 9474F came in at $6780. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $6780), EPYC 9375F was $1474 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9474F — making the EPYC 9375F the 17.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-22% | $6780 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+19% | 15.1 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9375F and EPYC 9474F
