EPYC 9454P vs Xeon Platinum 8470

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9454P

48 / 96

94,686

+5.4%

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8470

52 / 104

89,850

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon Platinum 8470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon Platinum 8470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
✅Costs $4,761 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8470

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (89,850 vs 94,686).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454P better than Xeon Platinum 8470?

Yes. EPYC 9454P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9454P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454P is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9454P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9454P comes in $4,761 cheaper on MSRP at $4,598 MSRP versus $9,359 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 114.5% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9454P

The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

Xeon Platinum 8470

The Xeon Platinum 8470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 89,850 points. Launch price was $9,359.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8470 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9454P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the Xeon Platinum 8470's 89,850 — a 5.2% lead for the EPYC 9454P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8470.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon Platinum 8470
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	52 / 104+8%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+38%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+144%	105 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	94,686+5%	89,850
Geekbench 6 Single	1,923	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,576	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9454P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8470). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8470) — the EPYC 9454P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon Platinum 8470
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon Platinum 8470). Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon Platinum 8470 targets Cloud Infrastructure. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; Xeon Platinum 8470 rivals EPYC 9534.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon Platinum 8470
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Cloud Infrastructure

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9454P was priced at $4598, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 came in at $9359. On launch pricing ($4598 vs $9359), EPYC 9454P was $4761 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8470 — making the EPYC 9454P the 72.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP	$4598-51%	$9359
Performance per Dollar	20.6+115%	9.6
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9454P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8470 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.