EPYC 9454P vs Xeon w9-3495X

AMD

EPYC 9454P

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w9-3495X

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
Similar parts

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

  • +143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
  • Costs $1,291 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
  • Delivers 34.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
  • Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
  • 14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,576 vs 18,600).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
  • 20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than EPYC 9454P?
Yes. Xeon w9-3495X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3495X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3495X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w9-3495X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9454P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w9-3495X comes in 28.1% more expensive on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $4,598 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9454P is also 34.1% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w9-3495X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9454P vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9454P

The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

Intel

Xeon w9-3495X

The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon w9-3495X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.75 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9454P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 4.6% lead for the EPYC 9454P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,923 vs 2,136, a 10.5% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,576 vs 18,600 (0.1% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon w9-3495X
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
56 / 112+17%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.8 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.75 GHz+45%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+144%
105 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
94,686+5%
90,441
Cinebench R23 Multi
72,560
Geekbench 6 Single
1,923
2,136+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,576
18,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9454P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454P) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3495X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the EPYC 9454P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon w9-3495X
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+50%
4096 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+14%
112
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon w9-3495X
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
true
Target Use
Data Center / Single Socket
Ultimate Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9454P was priced at $4598, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($4598 vs $5889), EPYC 9454P was $1291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the EPYC 9454P the 29.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon w9-3495X
MSRP
$4598-22%
$5889
Performance per Dollar
20.6+34%
15.4
Release Date
2022
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.