EPYC 9534
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9534
2022Why buy it
- ✅+30.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 20,256).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+30.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $3,314 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,266 vs 1,650).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9534 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9534 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9534
The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9534 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9534 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9534 scores 89,077 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 6.8% lead for the EPYC 9534. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,650 vs 1,266, a 26.3% lead for the EPYC 9534 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 20,256 (26.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9534 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 2.7 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 89,077+7% | 83,235 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 64,355 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,650+30% | 1,266 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,500 | 20,256+31% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9534 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9534 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — the EPYC 9534 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9534) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9534) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9534 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9534 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9534 was priced at $8803, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX came in at $5489. On launch pricing ($8803 vs $5489), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was $3314 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9534 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 39.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8803 | $5489-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | 15.2+50% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9534 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
