EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9534
EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9534
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9275F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9534
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) | ✅ More affordable ($2,999) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+21%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) | ✅ More affordable ($2,999) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9275F and EPYC 9534
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
EPYC 9534
The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9534 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9534 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9534 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the EPYC 9534's 89,077 — a 5.1% lead for the EPYC 9534. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 64 / 128+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+67% | 2.45 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 84,620 | 89,077+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9534 — the EPYC 9275F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and SP5 (EPYC 9534).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+119900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534). Primary use case: EPYC 9534 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9275F launched at $3439 MSRP, while the EPYC 9534 debuted at $8803. At current prices ($3439 vs $2999), the EPYC 9534 is $440 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9534 — making the EPYC 9534 the 18.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-61% | $8803 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3439 | $2999-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 29.7+21% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and EPYC 9534
