EPYC 7J13 vs EPYC 9275F
EPYC 7J13
EPYC 9275F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7J13
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9275F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7J13 | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($150) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7J13 | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2197%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($150) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7J13 and EPYC 9275F
EPYC 7J13
The EPYC 7J13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 84,786 points. Launch price was $6,000.
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7J13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9275F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7J13 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7J13 versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F — a 31.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 2.55 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The EPYC 7J13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9275F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7J13 scores 84,786 against the EPYC 9275F's 84,620 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7J13. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+167% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz | 4.1 GHz+61% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 84,786 | 84,620 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7J13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9275F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7J13 versus 6000 on the EPYC 9275F — the EPYC 9275F supports 60.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7J13) vs 12 (EPYC 9275F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7J13) and SP5 (EPYC 9275F).
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6000+88% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9275F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7J13) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7J13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P.
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7J13 launched at $7890 MSRP, while the EPYC 9275F debuted at $3439. At current prices ($150 vs $3439), the EPYC 7J13 is $3289 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7J13 delivers 565.2 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9275F — making the EPYC 7J13 the 183.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7890 | $3439-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-96% | $3439 |
| Performance per Dollar | 565.2+2198% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7J13 and EPYC 9275F
