EPYC 7J13
Xeon w9-3495X
EPYC 7J13 vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7J13 vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7J13 vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7J13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,786 vs 90,441).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3495X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w9-3495X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than EPYC 7J13?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7J13 vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7J13
The EPYC 7J13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 84,786 points. Launch price was $6,000.
Xeon w9-3495X
The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7J13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 7J13 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7J13 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.55 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 7J13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7J13 scores 84,786 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 6.5% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7J13 vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+14% | 56 / 112 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz+34% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+144% | 105 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 84,786 | 90,441+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 72,560 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,600 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7J13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7J13 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X — the Xeon w9-3495X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7J13) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the EPYC 7J13 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7J13) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3495X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7J13) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7J13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | true |
| Target Use | — | Ultimate Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7J13 was priced at $7890, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($7890 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3495X was $2001 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7J13 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the Xeon w9-3495X the 35.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7J13 | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7890 | $5889-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 15.4+44% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7J13 and Xeon w9-3495X
