EPYC 9275F vs Xeon 6780E

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon 6780E Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9275F

24 / 48

84,620

0.0%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon 6780E

144 / 144

86,734

+2.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon 6780E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon 6780E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9275F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
✅Costs $7,911 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 222.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 330W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (84,620 vs 86,734).

Xeon 6780E

2024

Why buy it

✅+2.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9275F better than Xeon 6780E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9275F is ahead with a 31.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6780E pulls ahead with 2.5% better PassMark. EPYC 9275F also has the bigger cache pool with 137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6780E is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 144 cores and 144 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9275F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9275F comes in $7,911 cheaper on MSRP at $3,439 MSRP versus $11,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon 6780E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.5% better PassMark. It is also 222.0% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6780E is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon 6780E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9275F

The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.

Xeon 6780E

The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 120 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 46.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon 6780E
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	144 / 144+500%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+60%	3 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+86%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+137%	108 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB (per module)+300%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	84,620	86,734+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the Xeon 6780E supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 153500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 8 (Xeon 6780E). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9275F) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the EPYC 9275F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon 6780E
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6000	DDR5-6400+7%
Max RAM Capacity	6144 TB+153500%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon 6780E
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	—	Cloud Native Compute

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9275F was priced at $3439, while the Xeon 6780E came in at $11350. On launch pricing ($3439 vs $11350), EPYC 9275F was $7911 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the EPYC 9275F the 105.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon 6780E
MSRP	$3439-70%	$11350
Performance per Dollar	24.6+224%	7.6
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 9275F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6780E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.