EPYC 9275F vs Xeon 6780E
EPYC 9275F
Xeon 6780E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9275F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6780E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,439) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+142%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,439) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9275F and Xeon 6780E
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 120 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 46.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 144 / 144+500% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+60% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+86% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+137% | 108 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 84,620 | 86,734+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the EPYC 9275F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 8 (Xeon 6780E). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9275F) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the EPYC 9275F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+119900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 4 TB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9275F launched at $3439 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. At current prices ($3439 vs $8513), the EPYC 9275F is $5074 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the EPYC 9275F the 82.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-70% | $11350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3439-60% | $8513 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+141% | 10.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and Xeon 6780E
