EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9454
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9454 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9454 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9454: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9275F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,786 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,620 vs 87,961).
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- ✅+3.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 290W instead of 320W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9275F better than EPYC 9454?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9454 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9454 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9454 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9454 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the EPYC 9454's 87,961 — a 3.9% lead for the EPYC 9454. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 48 / 96+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+26% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+49% | 2.75 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 84,620 | 87,961+4% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 — the EPYC 9275F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and SP5 (EPYC 9454).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+25% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 TB+102300% | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | — | Data Center |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9275F was priced at $3439, while the EPYC 9454 came in at $5225. On launch pricing ($3439 vs $5225), EPYC 9275F was $1786 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9454 — making the EPYC 9275F the 37.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-34% | $5225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+46% | 16.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and EPYC 9454
