EPYC 9275F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
EPYC 9275F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9275F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,439) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,486) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,439) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,486) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 13.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 1.7% lead for the EPYC 9275F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 64 / 128+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+52% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 84,620+2% | 83,235 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 64,355 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,266 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,256 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — the EPYC 9275F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+149900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 2048 GB+34952433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9275F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9275F launched at $3439 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX debuted at $5489. At current prices ($3439 vs $3486), the EPYC 9275F is $47 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 23.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the EPYC 9275F the 3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-37% | $5489 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3439-1% | $3486 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+3% | 23.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
