EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 6747P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9554

64 / 128

104,336

+2.6%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6747P

48 / 96

101,685

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 6747P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 6747P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9554

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($9,087 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
✅Draws 330W instead of 360W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9554 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (101,685 vs 104,336).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9554 better than Xeon 6747P?

Yes. EPYC 9554 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9554 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9554 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6747P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9554 comes in 39.9% more expensive on MSRP at $9,087 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6747P is also 36.3% better value on MSRP (15.7 vs 11.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 6747P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9554

The EPYC 9554 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.75 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 104,336 points. Launch price was $9,087.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9554 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9554 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.75 GHz on the EPYC 9554 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Xeon 6747P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9554 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9554 scores 104,336 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9554. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9554 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+33%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.75 GHz	3.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+15%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	104,336+3%	101,685
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9554 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9554 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6747P — the Xeon 6747P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9554 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9554) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9554) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9554 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9554) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9554) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9554 targets Data Center, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9554 rivals Xeon 8468; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9554 was priced at $9087, while the Xeon 6747P came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($9087 vs $6497), Xeon 6747P was $2590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9554 delivers 11.5 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Xeon 6747P the 30.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
MSRP	$9087	$6497-29%
Performance per Dollar	11.5	15.7+37%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search EPYC 9554 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6747P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.