Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9554

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9475F

48 Cores96 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9554

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.75 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9554 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9475F
48 / 96
122,476
+17.4%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
EPYC 9554
64 / 128
104,336
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 9 7945HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9554 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low315 FPS
medium289 FPS
high240 FPS
ultra203 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low171 FPS
medium142 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low725 FPS
medium618 FPS
high485 FPS
ultra421 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low533 FPS
medium465 FPS
high373 FPS
ultra303 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low906 FPS
medium738 FPS
high668 FPS
ultra566 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low673 FPS
medium562 FPS
high523 FPS
ultra455 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low1139 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high901 FPS
ultra812 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low905 FPS
medium823 FPS
high709 FPS
ultra626 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low304 FPS
medium232 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra189 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low283 FPS
medium250 FPS
high197 FPS
ultra160 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low257 FPS
medium227 FPS
high179 FPS
ultra147 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low369 FPS
medium329 FPS
high286 FPS
ultra244 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low317 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low283 FPS
medium265 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9554
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9554: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $1,495 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 40.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9554

2022

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (104,336 vs 122,476).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($9,087 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 9475F better than EPYC 9554?
    Yes. EPYC 9475F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9475F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 9475F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9475F comes in $1,495 cheaper on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $9,087 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.5% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 11.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9475F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9554 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9475F

    The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

    AMD

    EPYC 9554

    The EPYC 9554 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.75 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 104,336 points. Launch price was $9,087.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9554 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9554 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.75 GHz on the EPYC 9554 — a 24.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9554 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9554's 104,336 — a 16% lead for the EPYC 9475F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9554
    Cores / Threads
    48 / 96
    64 / 128+33%
    Boost Clock
    4.8 GHz+28%
    3.75 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.65 GHz+18%
    3.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm-20%
    5 nm, 6 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Genoa (2022−2023)
    PassMark
    122,476+17%
    104,336
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,960
    —
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    45,000
    —
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9475F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9554 — the EPYC 9475F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SP5 (EPYC 9554).

    FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9554
    Socket
    SP5
    SP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000+25%
    DDR5-4800
    Max RAM Capacity
    6144 GB
    6 TB
    RAM Channels
    12
    12
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9554). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9554 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9554 rivals Xeon 8468.

    FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9554
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    Yes
    —
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    Target Use
    Server
    Data Center
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the EPYC 9554 came in at $9087. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $9087), EPYC 9475F was $1495 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 11.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9554 — making the EPYC 9475F the 33.7% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9554
    MSRP
    $7592-16%
    $9087
    Performance per Dollar
    16.1+40%
    11.5
    Release Date
    2024
    2022
    Search EPYC 9475F on AmazonSearch EPYC 9554 on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.