EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9654P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9654P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9654P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9475F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,033 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
EPYC 9654P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 360W instead of 400W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,214 vs 45,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9475F better than EPYC 9654P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9654P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
EPYC 9654P
The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9654P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P — a 25.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9654P's 116,324 — a 5.2% lead for the EPYC 9475F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,025, a 3.3% lead for the EPYC 9654P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 23,214 (63.9% advantage for the EPYC 9475F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654P.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 96 / 192+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+52% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 122,476+5% | 116,324 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | 2,025+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+94% | 23,214 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9475F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654P — the EPYC 9475F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SP5 (EPYC 9654P).
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9654P). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Server | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the EPYC 9654P came in at $10625. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $10625), EPYC 9475F was $3033 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 10.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654P — making the EPYC 9475F the 38.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7592-29% | $10625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+48% | 10.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9475F and EPYC 9654P
