
EPYC 9475F vs Xeon 6960P

EPYC 9475F

Xeon 6960P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6960P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9475F | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,625) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9475F | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+19%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,625) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9475F and Xeon 6960P

EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 20.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 6.5% lead for the Xeon 6960P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,100, a 6.9% lead for the Xeon 6960P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 60,000 (28.6% advantage for the Xeon 6960P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 72 / 144+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+35% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 432 MB (total)+69% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 122,476 | 130,659+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | 2,100+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | 60,000+33% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9475F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 3072 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9475F) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the EPYC 9475F offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA7529 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+100% | 3072 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9475F launched at $7592 MSRP, while the Xeon 6960P debuted at $9625. At current prices ($7592 vs $9625), the EPYC 9475F is $2033 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the EPYC 9475F the 17.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7592-21% | $9625 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $7592-21% | $9625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+18% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















