EPYC 9475F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
EPYC 9475F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9475F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,879.97) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9475F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+11%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,879.97) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9475F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 15.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,100, a 6.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 81,000 (57.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 96 / 192+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+46% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 122,476 | 143,017+17% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 148,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | 2,100+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | 81,000+80% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9475F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9475F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Server | Workstation / Scientific Computing |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9475F launched at $7592 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. At current prices ($7592 vs $9879.97), the EPYC 9475F is $2288 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the EPYC 9475F the 10.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7592-24% | $9999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $7592-23% | $9879.97 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+11% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9475F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
