EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9475F

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9475F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9455P

48 / 96

116,926

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

EPYC 9475F

48 / 96

122,476

+4.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9475F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9475F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9455P

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,773 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 400W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 45,000).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 300W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9475F better than EPYC 9455P?

Yes. EPYC 9475F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2270.9% better Geekbench multi-core, 4.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9475F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2270.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9475F is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9455P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9475F comes in 57.5% more expensive on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $4,819 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9455P is also 50.4% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 16.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9475F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 48/96 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9475F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9455P

The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9455P and EPYC 9475F share an identical 48-core/96-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F — a 8.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.15 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9475F's 122,476 — a 4.6% lead for the EPYC 9475F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,960, a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 9455P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 45,000 (183.8% advantage for the EPYC 9475F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9475F
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	48 / 96
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.15 GHz	3.65 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	116,926	122,476+5%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	45,000+2271%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6144 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9475F).

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9475F
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+50%	6144 GB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9455P) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9475F). Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9475F targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9475F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9455P was priced at $4819, while the EPYC 9475F came in at $7592. On launch pricing ($4819 vs $7592), EPYC 9455P was $2773 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9475F — making the EPYC 9455P the 40.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9475F
MSRP	$4819-37%	$7592
Performance per Dollar	24.3+51%	16.1
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 9455P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9475F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.