EPYC 9455P
EPYC 9745
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9745 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9745 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9455P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,322 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 125.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 400W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (116,926 vs 130,698).
EPYC 9745
2024Why buy it
- ✅+11.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9455P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 300W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9455P better than EPYC 9745?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9745 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9455P
The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.
EPYC 9745
The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9455P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9745 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9745's 130,698 — a 11.1% lead for the EPYC 9745. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 128 / 256+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz+31% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 116,926 | 130,698+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9745).
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+50% | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center / High Density |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9455P was priced at $4819, while the EPYC 9745 came in at $12141. On launch pricing ($4819 vs $12141), EPYC 9455P was $7322 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9745 — making the EPYC 9455P the 77.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4819-60% | $12141 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.3+125% | 10.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9455P and EPYC 9745
