EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P

AMD

EPYC 9455P

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 9654P

96 Cores192 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9455P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $5,806 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
  • Delivers 121.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
  • Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 23,214).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

  • +1123.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9455P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9455P better than EPYC 9654P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9455P is ahead with a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9654P pulls ahead with 1123.1% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9654P also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9654P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1123.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9455P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9455P comes in $5,806 cheaper on MSRP at $4,819 MSRP versus $10,625 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9654P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1123.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 121.6% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 10.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9455P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9455P

The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

AMD

EPYC 9654P

The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9455P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9654P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9654P's 116,324 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,025, a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 9654P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 23,214 (169.8% advantage for the EPYC 9654P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9455P vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654P.

FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9654P
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
96 / 192+100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+19%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.15 GHz+31%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
116,926
116,324
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
2,025+3%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
23,214+1123%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9455P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654P — the EPYC 9455P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9654P).

FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9654P
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+25%
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
9 TB+50%
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H.

FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9654P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Single Socket
Data Center / Single Socket
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9455P was priced at $4819, while the EPYC 9654P came in at $10625. On launch pricing ($4819 vs $10625), EPYC 9455P was $5806 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 10.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654P — making the EPYC 9455P the 75.6% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9654P
MSRP
$4819-55%
$10625
Performance per Dollar
24.3+123%
10.9
Release Date
2024
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.