
EPYC 9455P

EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9455P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,806 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 23,214).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
EPYC 9654P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1123.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9455P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9455P better than EPYC 9654P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9654P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9455P
The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

EPYC 9654P
The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9455P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9654P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9654P's 116,324 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,025, a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 9654P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 23,214 (169.8% advantage for the EPYC 9654P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9455P vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654P.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 96 / 192+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz+31% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 116,926 | 116,324 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,025+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 23,214+1123% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9455P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654P — the EPYC 9455P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9654P).
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+50% | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9455P was priced at $4819, while the EPYC 9654P came in at $10625. On launch pricing ($4819 vs $10625), EPYC 9455P was $5806 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 10.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654P — making the EPYC 9455P the 75.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4819-55% | $10625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.3+123% | 10.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















