EPYC 9475F vs Xeon 6781P

EPYC 9475F vs Xeon 6781P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9475F

48 / 96

122,476

+3.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Xeon 6781P

80 / 160

117,946

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9475F vs Xeon 6781P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9475F vs Xeon 6781P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,368 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 336 MB).

Xeon 6781P

2025

Why buy it

✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (117,946 vs 122,476).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9475F better than Xeon 6781P?

Yes. EPYC 9475F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9475F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9475F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9475F comes in $1,368 cheaper on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $8,960 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 22.6% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6781P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and 31.3% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 256 MB). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9475F vs Xeon 6781P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

Xeon 6781P

The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the Xeon 6781P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9475F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Xeon 6781P
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	80 / 160+67%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+26%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.65 GHz+83%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	336 MB (total)+31%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	122,476+4%	117,946
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9475F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9475F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6781P — the Xeon 6781P supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9475F) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9475F) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Xeon 6781P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400+7%
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Xeon 6781P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Server	Data Center / Cloud Scale

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the Xeon 6781P came in at $8960. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $8960), EPYC 9475F was $1368 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the EPYC 9475F the 20.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Xeon 6781P
MSRP	$7592-15%	$8960
Performance per Dollar	16.1+22%	13.2
Release Date	2024	2025

Search EPYC 9475F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6781P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.