Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9575F

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9475F

48 Cores96 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9575F

64 Cores128 Thrd400 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9575F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9475F
48 / 96
122,476
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
EPYC 9575F
64 / 128
147,718
+20.6%
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9575F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low315 FPS
medium289 FPS
high240 FPS
ultra203 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low303 FPS
medium280 FPS
high232 FPS
ultra196 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low725 FPS
medium618 FPS
high485 FPS
ultra421 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low797 FPS
medium681 FPS
high536 FPS
ultra466 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low906 FPS
medium738 FPS
high668 FPS
ultra566 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low884 FPS
medium721 FPS
high652 FPS
ultra553 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low1139 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high901 FPS
ultra812 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low1118 FPS
medium1007 FPS
high884 FPS
ultra797 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low304 FPS
medium232 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra189 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low311 FPS
medium236 FPS
high214 FPS
ultra191 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low283 FPS
medium250 FPS
high197 FPS
ultra160 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low272 FPS
medium239 FPS
high188 FPS
ultra151 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low369 FPS
medium329 FPS
high286 FPS
ultra244 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low366 FPS
medium327 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra244 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low283 FPS
medium265 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9575F
low283 FPS
medium264 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9575F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅+53.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • ✅Costs $4,199 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 28.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 45,000).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
  • ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9475F better than EPYC 9575F?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9575F is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F pulls ahead with 53.5% better Geekbench multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F is the stronger fit. You are getting 53.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9475F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9475F comes in $4,199 cheaper on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it still gives you 53.5% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that EPYC 9575F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.8% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9475F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9575F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

AMD

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9575F offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F — a 4.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9575F's 147,718 — a 18.7% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 29,308 (42.2% advantage for the EPYC 9475F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9575F
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
64 / 128+33%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
3.65 GHz+11%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
122,476
147,718+21%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960
—
Geekbench 6 Multi
45,000+54%
29,308
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SP5 (EPYC 9575F).

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9575F
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P.

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9575F
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
—
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
Yes
—
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Server
Data Center / High Frequency
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the EPYC 9575F came in at $11791. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $11791), EPYC 9475F was $4199 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 12.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9575F — making the EPYC 9475F the 25.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9575F
MSRP
$7592-36%
$11791
Performance per Dollar
16.1+29%
12.5
Release Date
2024
2024
Search EPYC 9475F on AmazonSearch EPYC 9575F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.