EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9745
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9745 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9745 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9475F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,549 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (122,476 vs 130,698).
EPYC 9745
2024Why buy it
- ✅+6.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9745 better than EPYC 9475F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9745 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
EPYC 9745
The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9745 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9745's 130,698 — a 6.5% lead for the EPYC 9745. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 128 / 256+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+52% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 122,476 | 130,698+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SP5 (EPYC 9745).
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9745). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Server | Data Center / High Density |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the EPYC 9745 came in at $12141. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $12141), EPYC 9475F was $4549 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9745 — making the EPYC 9475F the 39.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9475F | EPYC 9745 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7592-37% | $12141 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+49% | 10.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9475F and EPYC 9745
