EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9565

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9565 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9475F

48 / 96

122,476

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

EPYC 9565

72 / 144

135,221

+10.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9565 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9565: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,894 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (122,476 vs 135,221).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

✅+10.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9565 better than EPYC 9475F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9475F is ahead with a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9565 pulls ahead with 10.4% better PassMark. EPYC 9565 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9565 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.4% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 144 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9565 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9475F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9565 comes in 38.1% more expensive on MSRP at $10,486 MSRP versus $7,592 MSRP, and it still gives you 10.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9475F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9475F is also 25.1% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9565 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9565 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9565 offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the EPYC 9565 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 — a 11% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 3.15 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9565's 135,221 — a 9.9% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	EPYC 9565
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	72 / 144+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+12%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.65 GHz+16%	3.15 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	122,476	135,221+10%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SP5 (EPYC 9565).

Feature	EPYC 9475F	EPYC 9565
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9565). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	EPYC 9565
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Server	Data Center / Cloud Computing

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the EPYC 9565 came in at $10486. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $10486), EPYC 9475F was $2894 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 12.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9565 — making the EPYC 9475F the 22.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	EPYC 9565
MSRP	$7592-28%	$10486
Performance per Dollar	16.1+25%	12.9
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 9475F on Amazon

Search EPYC 9565 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.